Comparison · ReadMe.com

docs-keeper vs ReadMe.com

ReadMe.com hosts and renders. docs-keeper authors the diffs.

ReadMe.com is a great hosted-docs platform with API reference generation, versioning, and an editor for tech writers. docs-keeper is an agent that opens PRs against the markdown files your team owns. If you write docs in your repo, docs-keeper keeps them current; if your docs only live in ReadMe.com's editor, our value is limited.

Feature-by-feature

Featuredocs-keeperReadMe.com
Hosted docs siteNoYes
API reference auto-generationNoYes
PR-triggered doc updatesYesNo
Brand voice from existing docsYesNo
Markdown source of truth in gitYesoptional sync
Validation gate against hallucinationYesNo
Free tier1 repo · 20 PRs/moFree trial

Frequently asked

Can I use both?

Yes if your ReadMe.com setup syncs from a git repo. docs-keeper opens the PRs that update that repo; ReadMe.com renders the result for end users.

What about ReadMe.com's AI Assist?

ReadMe.com's AI helps writers in their editor. docs-keeper is workflow-driven — it reacts to merges, not to a human pressing "generate".

Try docs-keeper free

One public repo, 20 doc PRs per month, no credit card. See if drafts read like your team before committing to a paid plan.